San Francisco

In Compliance
Out of Compliance
Unincorporated Area
Unincorporated Area
Unincorporated Area

Overview

Population
851036
Density
18157
Avg. Household Income
$
136689
Experiencing Rent Burden
35
Providing adequate housing options is a key function of local governments. To help residents ensure their local government is meeting this need, we’ve compiled important information about this jurisdiction’s housing efforts below.
Housing Element is In Compliance
This city is currently working on implementing its housing element.
Housing Element is Out of Compliance
This city is currently working on implementing its housing element.
Good Progress
This city is currently on track to meet their RHNA housing targets.
Making Slow Progress
This city is falling behind. It is not on track to meet its housing targets.
Housing Targets
Every 8 years California assesses housing need and assigns each city with a target they must hit. If 
San Francisco
 repeats its efforts from the previous cycle 
it will only meet 43% of the identified need.
Current RHNA Target
2022
 
-
 
2030
On Target
Behind
Hit Target
Missed
3034
 / 
82069
 units
Very Low Income
Low Income
Median Income
Above Median Income
State Statutes
Organizers fighting for fair housing can use many state laws to ensure that jurisdictions meet their housing targets.
Builder’s Remedy
When a city’s Housing Element is out of compliance, the Builder’s Remedy allows developers to bypass the zoning code and city general plan for qualifying affordable housing projects. If a Builders Remedy project application was submitted prior to 1/1/2025, there are virtually no limits on the size and density of a project proposed. Subsequent to 1/1/2025, in exchange for more certainty in the entitlement process, AB 1893 limits the density for Builders Remedy projects.
Does not apply
Does not apply
Does not apply
SB 423
When cities lack a compliant housing element or are behind on RHNA, this statute streamlines approval of projects that meet a threshold of affordable units.
10% Affordable & 20% Moderate
10% Affordable & 20% Moderate
Conditions in 
San Francisco County
HE Compliance
How does
 
San Francisco
 
compare to its neighboring cities?
This city is currently doing a better job than its neighbors at meeting housing needs.
Progress
0
0
Income
-4
-4
Density
96
96
San Francisco
's Plan
Add Policy
Key parts of
San Francisco
’s housing element are currently being worked on. Get involved to hold them accountable for meeting their deadlines.
Impactful Housing Element Policies:
No prioritized policies
There are no prioritized housing element policies for this jurisdiction which are currently being tracked. If you'd like to submit a policy to be tracked, please fill out the policy submission form.
Other Tracked Housing Element Policies:
Expanding Housing Choice (Rezoning Program)

2025-03-04 - JN - new rezoning map STILL has not been introduced yet. Mayor is saying okay things but has yet to put forth a map. Supervisors are looking for political direction from the Mayor. Planning is looking for political direction from the Supervisors

Hearing that a new map is supposedly going to come out next week but that has yet to be confirmed. We may have to take an OPPOSE posture if the map they submit is not as good as we we need it to be

2024-11-07 - JN - Having discussions with the Mayor's office about these items again to see if there will be any movement, but given the election results, seems likely this may not happen for a couple more months

This is San Francisco's rezoning program to comply with the Housing Element passed on January 2023

SF is currently planning a rezoning which lacks analysis required in the HE—an analytical model of likelihood of development which shows that the rezoning will create 36k units by 2031. The program would also be implemented as a local density bonus program instead of a rezoning and would prevent use of state density bonus law on "rezoned" parcels. We are fighting for HE implementation.

Public Draft
Due
Jan 31
2026
Central SoMa and Transit Center District Commercial Development Requirements

The way it was: Central SoMa has high requirements for office/mixed use components that were negotiated when it was passed pre-pandemic

Why the change: to allow for more flexibility for builders because there is no longer any demand for the office. This will make it easier for them to build homes there and unblock many of the projects that are important 

Required (not introducted)
Due
Constraints Reduction

Legislation designed to implement aspects of the Housing Element San Francisco agreed to in January 2023

Passed/Approved
Due
Housing Fee Reform Plan

Proposals will reduce inclusionary housing requirements for development projects and reform impact fees based on data to ensure new housing projects move forward

Passed/Approved
Due
Mayor’s rezoning

6-8 stories throughout the city 

Public Draft
Due
Join the Fun!
Our volunteers, watchdogs, push cities to enact good housing policy and keep tabs on the city’s policy progress. Sign up to help push
San Francisco
 reach its housing targets.
San Francisco County
's Volunteers
120
Current Watchdogs
  
Level V
120/200 Volunteers
Upcoming Opportunities
Add Event
These upcoming events and tasks are great opportunities to make a difference in your community.
Event Name
Date
Type
Stop by Drinks & Agendas
Each Friday at 12:00PST our team gets together via Zoom to monitor local agendas so we can direct watchdogs to key meetings where decisions are being made about housing.
Watchdog Reports
Add Report
Our watchdogs are on the ground observing and taking part in the fight for fair housing. Read their reports below.
San Francisco
's Reports
Anonymous
Jack Farrell
  
02
/
25

San Francisco is focusing efforts away from the east and south sides of the city for two reasons: 1. significant swaths of the city in those neighborhoods have already been upzoned by the Eastern Neighborhoods Plans: https://sfplanning.org/eastern-neighborhoods-plans. 2. To maintain AFFH concerns.

This has not extended to Bernal Heights, Glen Park, and North Beach which have been excluded from the sites inventory. 

Read More
   
/
 Loss
/
 Pro Housing
   
/
 Win
/
 Pro Housing
   
/
Deferred
/
 Pro Housing
   
/
 Loss
2
/
7
 Pro Housing
   
/
 Win
2
/
7
 Pro Housing
   
/
Deferred
2
/
7
 Pro Housing
Anonymous
  
03
/
23

Biggest topic, outside the usual business, was a hearing about Laguna Honda, a public nursing home that lost its federal CMS (Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services) funding last year (2022). The cessation of the funding was accompanied by a federal mandate to transfer all remaining residents at the hospital, which resulted in 57 deaths. Because of those deaths, the California Department of Public Health agreed to pause the transfers of patients out of the facility. 

At the Board of Supervisors hearing, interim CEO Roland Pickens answered questions about the issues at Laguna Honda which caused the facility to lose its funding, as well as the hospital's current plans to reinstate its funding and continue treating its patients. On the day of the hearing, CMS had not issued a statement as to whether or not it would require Laguna Honda to continue transferring its patients, which prompted round criticism of the federal body from many of the Supervisors. 

Read More
   
/
 Loss
0
/
15
 Pro Housing
   
/
 Win
0
/
15
 Pro Housing
   
/
Deferred
0
/
15
 Pro Housing
Anonymous
Robert Fruchtman
  
09
/
22

SF Planning says City Attorney David Chiu has told them that the Builder's Remedy until 120 days after the deadline has passed. So SF Planning is getting a draft ready by end of next week (or soon after) to send to HCD after 7 days of public comment have passed. They expect to get a pre-certification letter from HCD. Then they'll have approval hearings at the Planning Commission in February, SFBOS hearings in March/April, and final HCD certification in May.

Read More
San Francisco Planning Commission - Sep 29, 2022
   
09
/
22
 Loss
3
/
10
 Pro Housing
San Francisco Planning Commission - Sep 29, 2022
   
09
/
22
 Win
3
/
10
 Pro Housing
Planning Commission
   
09
/
22
Deferred
3
/
10
 Pro Housing
Anonymous
Caitlin Barta
  
01
/
22

There has been thorough community outreach and feedback synthesis that they are applying to the Housing Element, with heavy emphasis on hearing from communities of color. There was a list of fairly specific policy goals laid out based on the feedback. Projected # of units across all economic graphics was shown compared to the past targets and far surpasses what we had before. They openly acknowledged not hitting close to target in the past. I unfortunately had to leave before they concluded.

Read More
San Francisco Planning Commission - Jan 27, 2022
   
01
/
22
 Loss
4
/
4
 Pro Housing
San Francisco Planning Commission - Jan 27, 2022
   
01
/
22
 Win
4
/
4
 Pro Housing
Planning Commission
   
01
/
22
Deferred
4
/
4
 Pro Housing
Anonymous
Scott Breudecheck
  
03
/
21

Outreach efforts failed to capture priorities and interest from San Francisco's diverse community.  Most of the digital response predominantly came from white residents, with black residents especially underrepresented.  Closing the digital divide and investing in more in-person events with overlooked groups will require greater investment of time, energy, and funding.

Read More
San Francisco Other Public Meeting - Mar 18, 2021
   
03
/
21
 Loss
3
/
7
 Pro Housing
San Francisco Other Public Meeting - Mar 18, 2021
   
03
/
21
 Win
3
/
7
 Pro Housing
Other Public Meeting
   
03
/
21
Deferred
3
/
7
 Pro Housing