Fairfax

In Compliance
Out of Compliance
Unincorporated Area
Unincorporated Area
Unincorporated Area

Overview

Population
1776
Density
807
Avg. Household Income
$
126034
Experiencing Rent Burden
46
Providing adequate housing options is a key function of local governments. To help residents ensure their local government is meeting this need, we’ve compiled important information about this jurisdiction’s housing efforts below.
Housing Element is In Compliance
This city is currently working on implementing its housing element.
Housing Element is Out of Compliance
This city is currently working on implementing its housing element.
Good Progress
This city is currently on track to meet their RHNA housing targets.
Making Slow Progress
This city is falling behind. It is not on track to meet its housing targets.
Housing Targets
Every 8 years California assesses housing need and assigns each city with a target they must hit. If 
Fairfax
 repeats its efforts from the previous cycle 
it will only meet 31% of the identified need.
Current RHNA Target
2022
 
-
 
2030
On Target
Behind
Hit Target
Missed
6
 / 
490
 units
Very Low Income
Low Income
Median Income
Above Median Income
State Statutes
Organizers fighting for fair housing can use many state laws to ensure that jurisdictions meet their housing targets.
Builder’s Remedy
When a city’s Housing Element is out of compliance, the Builder’s Remedy allows developers to bypass the zoning code and city plans another couple of words.
Does not apply
Does not apply
Does not apply
SB 423
When cities lack a compliant housing element or are behind on RHNA, this statute streamlines approval of projects that meet a threshold of affordable units.
10% Affordable & 20% Moderate
10% Affordable & 20% Moderate
Conditions in 
Marin County
HE Compliance
How does
 
Fairfax
 
compare to its neighboring cities?
This city is currently doing a worse job than its neighbors at meeting housing needs.
Progress
-3
-3
Income
-8
-8
Density
-27
-27
Join the Fun!
Key parts of
Fairfax
’s housing element are currently being worked on. Get involved to hold them accountable for meeting their deadlines.
Marin County
's Volunteers
13
Current Watchdogs
  
Level II
13/20 Volunteers
Upcoming Opportunities
Add Event
These upcoming events and tasks are great opportunities to make a difference in your community.
Event Name
Date
Type
Stop by Drinks & Agendas
Each Friday at 12:00PST our team gets together via Zoom to monitor local agendas so we can direct watchdogs to key meetings where decisions are being made about housing.
Watchdog Reports
Add Report
Our watchdogs are on the ground observing and taking part in the fight for fair housing. Read their reports below.
Fairfax
's Reports
Anonymous
Jenny Silva
  
03
/
24

Jenny Silva: Housing Element Watchdog Check-in Agenda by Lucy

- Which city(s) are you monitoring, and which chapter(s) if any are you coordinating with?

    - Marin unincorporated, Sausalito

- Do you know if your city committed to a rezoning?

    - Marin County and Sausalito committed to rezoning - Marin County already adopted the HE, 6/12 have certified HE as of now 

    - YIMBY Law is suing Sausalito already according to Jenny 

    - What is the deadline for this rezoning?

        - Sausalito: Will be on 2024 election ballot but have to date done nothing to put on ballot 

        - MC: done, met deadline

- What policies did your city commit to enacting? (If no, ask if any city-owned sites are on the site inventory.)

    -  Which ones are you most excited about?

        - Both MC and S committed to objective design standards

        - Not strict deadlines for policies proposed 

        - MC: commitments to rental registries, tenant protections 

- If rezonings or policies have been introduced, do you know what the timelines and local processes are for passing? What progress has been made?

    - Objective design - committed, no deadline 

    - Tenant protections, committed, no deadline (that Jenny knows of) 

- When are the upcoming public hearings or housing element updates?

    - Tenant protections in MC: many upcoming meetings, Jenny will send me dates after

Read More
   
/
 Loss
/
 Pro Housing
   
/
 Win
/
 Pro Housing
   
/
Deferred
/
 Pro Housing
Anonymous
Jenny Silva
  
01
/
23

The Marin County Board of Supervisors met to adopt the housing element and submit the revisions to the state. Most of the Marin pro-housing community was in support of this housing element. The NIMBY planning commission did not recommend adoption? The nicest thing about the meeting was probably 30 people got up to say that we need housing in Marin. 

Read More
Marin County City Council - Jan 24, 2023
   
01
/
23
 Loss
/
 Pro Housing
Marin County City Council - Jan 24, 2023
   
01
/
23
 Win
/
 Pro Housing
City Council
   
01
/
23
Deferred
/
 Pro Housing
Anonymous
Jenny Silva
  
01
/
23

The planning commission was planning to recommend approval of the latest draft of the Housing Element. On 1/24 the Board of Supervisors will be voting on whether to adopt the Housing Element. It's interesting because the Planning Commission is very NIMBY and they want the Housing Element to be weakened. However, this will make it more difficult for the Board of Supervisors to approve the Housing Element on 1/24. At this point, the County staff have worked so hard to appease the Planning Commission that the current housing element is not compliant. Catholic Charities, which owns the largest property and has been wanting to develop for 30 years, wrote in to say the proposed zoning would make development infeasible. They note that any requirement for more than 20% affordable housing requires funding, and Marin County is not offering funding. So, I don't think this Housing Element is near compliant. But, the Planning Commission action will increase the likelihood of the Builder's Remedy being applied. 

I have more details in the tweets I shared during the meeting: https://twitter.com/jrskis/status/1611137096231817222

Read More
   
/
 Loss
/
 Pro Housing
   
/
 Win
/
 Pro Housing
   
/
Deferred
/
 Pro Housing
Anonymous
Jenny Silva
  
06
/
22

This was a public meeting to receive input into the housing element. The city council asked a lot of questions about the consequences for not building. The tenor of the questions was that maybe they don't need to worry about the feasibility of the element. This may be important if sites don't improve. 

I made these comments: ·     On site selection: The county has not adequately addressed the probability of sites being developed. It looks like they have a buffer of 61/3059 units - less than 2%. This is a problem for multiple reasons:

o  Unfortunately, the site inventory looks like it has many unlikely sites - there are many privately owned sites slated for a relatively low number of affordable units. For example, a Sloat nursery location is slated for 26 affordable units - this is 100% of the units. My understanding is that it is extremely difficult to get a 100% affordable unit project to pencil, especially if there are land costs involved. Is Sloat interested in converting its nursery to housing? Two Marin City Churches are on the inventory. Without confirmation of interest from the owners, we have to assume that a substantial percentage will not convert. This housing element doesn't do that. 

HCD is requiring jurisdictions to consider the probability of development. Marin County's is not good. Last cycle, only 1 of the identified sites was converted to housing. Marin County did not meet it's RHNA for affordable housing last cycle, and 80% of the affordable units produced were ADUs. Yet, it assumes that affordable 324 units will be produced on available land without changes. History shows this isn't realistic

I wanted to say, but ran out of time to say this:

·     I'm glad to see the Housing Element address that community resistance has restricted housing. However, I'm skeptical that an education program will fix this. We should expand byright approval to cover more projects. To the extent that education is undertaken, it should focus on the benefits of housing density overall - not just affordable housing.

·     I support the increase in height limits. I would encourage broader increases in densities as well. 

·     It looks like a large % of units compared to the population are located in the Western, less populated areas. Unless there are a lot of commuters going into these communities, it seems like it will worsen traffic issues, not resolve them. 

·     Many of the affordable housing sites are a relatively low number of units (<50 units) that are listed as all affordable units. Economics for small, 100% affordable projects do not pencil out. We need to increase density to make the projects bigger or move to more mixed income projects.

Read More
Marin County City Council - Jun 14, 2022
   
06
/
22
 Loss
/
 Pro Housing
Marin County City Council - Jun 14, 2022
   
06
/
22
 Win
/
 Pro Housing
City Council
   
06
/
22
Deferred
/
 Pro Housing
Anonymous
natalie
  
02
/
22

Most of the participants (who are local to either Marin or Sausalito) are in support of more housing.

Read More
   
/
 Loss
20
/
30
 Pro Housing
   
/
 Win
20
/
30
 Pro Housing
   
/
Deferred
20
/
30
 Pro Housing
Anonymous
estrull
  
02
/
22

The county is making there plan, lots of community opposition!

Read More
Marin County Community Workshop/Info Session - Nov 15, 2021
   
11
/
21
 Loss
1
/
15
 Pro Housing
Marin County Community Workshop/Info Session - Nov 15, 2021
   
11
/
21
 Win
1
/
15
 Pro Housing
Community Workshop/Info Session
   
11
/
21
Deferred
1
/
15
 Pro Housing
Anonymous
  
01
/
22

I got there late, but still was able to participate in a small breakout work session. I mean — it’s unincorporated Marin so there was a lot of grumbling especially about things like sewage and environmental hazards. But, people were generally trying to identify sites, mostly small scale, talking about ADUs, church parking lots, nonprofit developers. But they seemed receptive when I spoke about need for a lot more housing, upzoning and density, especially near transit as needed for equity and to allow young people to stay. They are using that Balancing Act site so will also input there. 

Read More
Marin County Community Workshop/Info Session - Jan 20, 2022
   
01
/
22
 Loss
/
 Pro Housing
Marin County Community Workshop/Info Session - Jan 20, 2022
   
01
/
22
 Win
/
 Pro Housing
Community Workshop/Info Session
   
01
/
22
Deferred
/
 Pro Housing
Anonymous
Jenny Silva
  
12
/
21

This was a presentation by the consultant on the Marin County Site Selection for the Housing Element. This is for unincorporated Marin County. Speakers have been heavily pro-housing. One speaker mentioned concerns about how septic systems will be handled with increased housing. the water crisis for West Marin was raised. One said Affirmatively Housing meant we should build in her neighborhood, rather than in Marin City. Several people mentioned that we need to actually build the housing, not just meet the RHNAs. One requested that ADUs not be considered, as most people building ADUs for guest quarters. 

Read More
   
/
 Loss
6
/
8
 Pro Housing
   
/
 Win
6
/
8
 Pro Housing
   
/
Deferred
6
/
8
 Pro Housing
Anonymous
  
04
/
21

The contractors for the housing element spoke. The contractors and the planners addressed the large increases in RHNA and the challenge in meeting to it. They are using EngagementHQ to get input from a broader representation of constituents. EngagementHQ is a platform that is also being used for Brea, Coronado and Lafayette. Suggested using stories from nurses and firefighters to build support for housing units. Goal is more inclusive unit. They plan to survey Fairfax employees that commute in. Site selection will be the meat of this element. Anticipate lively conversations. A commissioner asked about why this is different. The contractors answered that the volume is the biggest, but also stated that there are hammers now. Want to bring in illegal ADU units to count them. Fairfax only has a conditional approval of its last housing element. A commissioner stated that they did not believe they would be able to address the issues that led to a conditional approval.

Very emotional, almost crying NIMBY commenters that Fairfax can't do this because of water and fire safety. The citizens are saying that the council needs to be fighting the numbers. They are unhappy that the council seems to be have acquisied to the numbers. 

One homeowner said that she was not able to get insurance, and that this will be a problem for new housing.

Only one person supported housing. Everyone else was very upset and felt that the planning commissioner should be fighting the RHNA. 

Read More
Fairfax Community Workshop/Info Session - Apr 21, 2021
   
04
/
21
 Loss
1
/
7
 Pro Housing
Fairfax Community Workshop/Info Session - Apr 21, 2021
   
04
/
21
 Win
1
/
7
 Pro Housing
Community Workshop/Info Session
   
04
/
21
Deferred
1
/
7
 Pro Housing
Anonymous
Sonja Trauss
  
02
/
21

Pretty uneventful. The usual comments that ABAG or HCD don't understand, there just isn't any developable land in Marin county! 

There seemed to be Supervisors that support housing and the staff seemed really solid. Marin County has a CAC for the Housing Element process. 

Future TODO: See if we can still get YIMBYs on the CAC and if we can't, make sure watchdogs attend the CAC meetings.

Read More
   
/
 Loss
/
 Pro Housing
   
/
 Win
/
 Pro Housing
   
/
Deferred
/
 Pro Housing